Way to further already-tense race relations in America, Ralph Nader! :
Via CNN's Political Ticker (emphasis mine):
"There's only one thing different about Barack Obama when it comes to being a Democratic presidential candidate. He's half African-American," Nader told the paper in comments published Tuesday. "Whether that will make any difference, I don't know. I haven't heard him have a strong crackdown on economic exploitation in the ghettos. Payday loans, predatory lending, asbestos, lead. What's keeping him from doing that? Is it because he wants to talk white? He doesn't want to appear like Jesse Jackson? We'll see all that play out in the next few months and if he gets elected afterwards."
I disagree with Nader's language for a two reasons.
First, his race-based statements are inflammotory and serves no greater good in political discourse. No further discussion necessary.
Second, how can Barack Obama appeal to liberal white guilt when many white people aren't aware of their privledge to begin with? I am sure that Joe Caucasian understands that minorites are more like to be impoverished, but has no insight into the fact that their poverty is institutionalized and that our goverment systematically implements policies to keep them in poverty.
Third, Nader's statements are slightly disengenuous because Obama has spoken out on these things, especially in regards to the mortgage crisis.
Barack Obama was understandably not pleased with Nader's remarks (via the Chicago Sun-Times):
Speaking Wednesday, Obama almost sounded sorry for Nader. "Ralph Nader hadn't been paying attention to my speeches, because all the issues that he talked about -- whether it be predatory lending, the housing foreclosure crisis . . . I've devoted multiple speeches," Obama said. "Ralph Nader is trying to get attention. I think it's a shame because if you look at his legacy in terms of consumer protections, its an extraordinary one." But now, Obama said, "He's someone . . . whose campaign hasn't gotten any traction. So what better way to get some traction than to make an inflammatory statement like the one that he made? It is what it is."
I would tend to agree.